55 / 55

Differences that change the conversation

It’s just a joke

Intencja, wpływ i dowód

Marek makes a joke during a client conversation, Nia sees a tense reaction, and Anna needs specifics. Assessing the situation requires separating intention, impact and evidence.

Download the full comicPNGSVGPPTX
Marek, Nia, Anna in panel 1 of It’s just a joke.
No rush. Every decision at your company ages longer than a fine wine.
Marek, Nia, Anna in panel 2 of It’s just a joke.AFTER THE MEETING
The client clearly tensed up. And this isn’t the first comment like that from Marek.
What exactly did he say?
Marek, Nia, Anna in panel 3 of It’s just a joke.
I heard today’s one myself. The earlier ones were reported by the team.
I do not want to accuse someone based on hearsay.
Marek, Nia, Anna in panel 4 of It’s just a joke.
Will no response look like approval?
Am I supposed to act without verifiable facts?
Marek, Nia, Anna in panel 5 of It’s just a joke.
No labels. What was said, in front of whom, and what happened afterwards?
Em, the Empatyzer coach
Marek focuses on his intention to joke, Nia on the comment’s effect on the client, and Anna on what can be established reliably. None of these three perspectives is enough on its own for a fair assessment. Record the exact words, context and reaction first. Then discuss intention, impact and whether the behaviour forms a repeated pattern.