On this page
After a project wraps up, Anna is already moving on to the next topic when Maja stops her.
— Can you tell me what I did well on this project?
— If something had been wrong, I would definitely have told you.
For Anna, the absence of criticism is a sufficient signal of trust. Maja still does not know which specific behaviors are worth repeating.
How does Empatyzer turn silence into clear feedback?
Empatyzer helps you see that the boss may perceive the lack of comments as praise, and the employee may not know whether they is going in the right direction. This makes it easier to understand how to close this gap.
Features that can help:
- Talk to Em about a specific person: Allows you to prepare a conversation with a specific person around the situation "If I don't say anything, it's fine" based on your differences and the current context, instead of starting with a generic solution.
- Tips: They help you choose the tone, level of directness and the way of expressing the expectation in a situation: "If I don't say anything, it's fine" for this person, instead of using one message for everyone.
- Remember: Distils the relationship into a few simple rules that are worth having at hand in the next situation similar to "If I don't say anything, it's fine", before the old habits return.
What really happened
Anna sees her management style as simple and fair: if there is a problem, she says so; if she stays silent, everything is working. Maja needs more than the absence of an alarm. She wants to know what exactly she did well and what she should deliberately repeat. That does not have to be about wanting praise or reassurance. Silence only communicates “I see no problem”; it does not answer “which parts of my approach were effective?” This matters especially when someone is still building their own internal model of what good work looks like.
What the research says
Research on feedback shows that feedback is part of learning, but its effects depend on content and delivery; simply giving more feedback does not always improve performance (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Goodman, Wood & Chen, 2011). Research on feedback orientation also suggests that people who are more open to feedback tend to seek it more often and use it more effectively at work (2023 meta-analysis of 46 samples). From a learning perspective, positive feedback can therefore be more than a reward: it tells someone which behavior was effective and helps them build their own standard.
How to handle it
You do not have to praise everything. It is enough to occasionally name something specific: “That summary worked well because you separated facts from decisions,” or “You handled the meeting well when you stopped the conversation from drifting.” That is far more useful than a generic “great job”. The general rule: the absence of criticism tells people what does not need fixing; good positive feedback tells them what is worth deliberately repeating.
How Empatyzer and Em can help
Empatyzer can help Anna and Maja see that silence is not neutral information for everyone. Anna may naturally use a rule of “I speak up only when something needs correcting”, while Maja may need a positive signal as calibration: what exactly works and should be repeated. Personality and motivator profiles can show differences in needs around approval, certainty and feedback frequency. Em can help Anna introduce a very light ritual—occasionally naming one behavior worth keeping, without turning it into a ceremony. It can also help Maja ask for concrete information instead of waiting for praise. Micro-lessons reinforce that positive feedback does not have to be a reward or “stroking”; often it is simply useful information about what to continue doing.
Sources
- Avraham N. Kluger; Angelo DeNisi (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
- Jodi S. Goodman; Robert E. Wood; Zheng Chen (2011). Feedback specificity, information processing, and transfer of training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.001 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.001
- Ian M. Katz; Caroline M. Moughan; Cort W. Rudolph (2023). Feedback orientation: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 33(4), 100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100986 10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100986
Find an article
Enter at least 2 characters. Minor typos are OK.