On this page
At an all-company meeting at the end of the year, Anna announces an unusually large extra bonus.
— This has been a very good year. I really wanted to thank you all.
— Thank you. I really appreciate it — Jonas says.
A few days later, Anna finds herself missing even a small card from the team. She experienced the bonus as a personal gesture of appreciation; Jonas experienced it as part of the employer–employee relationship.
How does Empatyzer prevent misunderstandings about bonuses?
Empatyzer helps you see that the same bonus can be interpreted as compensation or a personal gesture. This makes it easier to understand how the "gift" frame changes the expectation of reciprocity.
Features that can help:
- Motivations: They show the strongest individual needs, making it easier to understand why the same stimulus, reward or form of competition affects people differently in the "It was a gift" situation.
- Comparison: Reveals the differences between you in areas such as the bonus, the frame of the gift and the expectation of reciprocity, so that in the "It was a gift" situation you do not interpret the other party's behaviour solely through your own way of acting.
- Tips: Help you choose the tone, level of directness, and expression of the expectation in a "It was a gift" situation for this person, rather than using one message for everyone.
What really happened
Anna decides to pay an additional bonus and experiences the decision as a personal gesture of recognition: “I wanted to share the success with you.” Afterwards, she finds herself wanting a small gesture in return—even a card. Jonas sees the money through a different structure. The employer has greater power, sets pay and awards bonuses, so an extra payment still belongs to the employment relationship. He is grateful, but he does not feel that Anna personally gave him a private gift. The same amount can therefore be experienced as compensation or as a gift that activates social expectations of reciprocity.
What the research says
Behavioral economics shows clearly that employment is not only a cold exchange of “money for work”. In experiments, extra pay or gifts from an employer can trigger greater effort in return—a pattern known as gift exchange (Fehr, Kirchsteiger & Riedl, 1998; Kube, Maréchal & Puppe, 2012). Framing matters as well. In Kube and colleagues’ study, a non-monetary gift produced stronger reciprocity than an equivalent amount of cash, and the way money was presented also changed how people responded. A 2026 field study again separates ordinary performance pay from a monetary “gift” and shows that people react differently to the two. This maps closely onto the scene: the meaning of money depends not only on the amount, but also on the social frame in which it is given.
How to handle it
An organization should be clear about what a payment is. If it is a performance bonus, state the criteria and do not expect private gratitude toward the boss. If a leader wants to make a personal gesture, they can write a personal note, say thank you directly or give a small symbolic gift within company rules. What should be avoided is an unspoken debt: “we gave you money, so now you owe me something personally.” The general rule: in a relationship involving power and pay, do not assume a financial benefit will be experienced as a private gift. If what you expect is a normal “thank you”, accept that and let the exchange end there.
How Empatyzer and Em can help
Empatyzer can help Anna and Jonas see that the bonus can carry two meanings at once: a gesture of recognition for the leader and part of compensation for the employee. Motivators related to status, recognition, fairness and independence may widen the difference in interpretation, but Em should not influence salary levels or decide bonuses. It can help Anna separate the messages: “This is a bonus for results,” and separately, “I’m genuinely grateful for the effort you put in.” That prevents gratitude from becoming a hidden obligation to reciprocate a personal gift. Jonas can understand the intent more clearly without feeling indebted. Micro-lessons reinforce that recognition can be personal in an employment relationship, while compensation rules should remain clear and professional.
Sources
- Ernst Fehr; Georg Kirchsteiger; Arno Riedl (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review, 42(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00051-7 10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00051-7
- Sebastian Kube; Michel André Maréchal; Clemens Puppe (2012). The Currency of Reciprocity: Gift Exchange in the Workplace. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1644-1662. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1644 10.1257/aer.102.4.1644
- Raoul Isselhard; Kathrin Manthei; Timo Vogelsang (2026). Performance pay, monetary gifts, and the moderating role of wage level. Management Accounting Research, 68, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100956 10.1016/j.mar.2025.100956
Find an article
Enter at least 2 characters. Minor typos are OK.